I've been
happily reading about old school horror movies on Wikipedia and IMDb.
Yeah, that's the subject of the week.
So, whilst
reading, it is fun to try to remember if I've seen a particular film
or not. In this vein I ran across Tombs of the Blind Dead (1972) and
vaguely remembered watching I ages ago. The synopsis seemed okay and
I found it on Youtube so why not? I'll tell you why not. The script
and pacing is awful. And the acting is sadly subpar.
I can deal
with the dubbing and the lack of lip sync, but it was atrocious
enough for me to turn the movie off, and instead watch a vastly
superior movie:
Stagefright
(1987).
I had seen
this ages ago during my late teens or early 20's. I remembered it
vaguely, but boy, was I pleasantly surprised.
Stagefright
is directed by Michele Soavi and was in fact his first full length
film, and what a home-run! He cut his teeth under Italian Giallo
master Dario Argento, and this debut shows he was paying attention.
In a
nutshell, the story is this: A group of dancers are rehearsing for a
show that's supposed to open in a week. One of the dancers (Alicia)
has injured her ankle sneaks off with the wardrobe mistress during a
break to see a doctor. The closest hospital happens to be a
psychiatric facility, where a murderous madman, Irving Wallace sees
Alicia. Unbeknownst to them he escapes and hides in their car. In no
time at all, the wardrobe mistress is killed and the police is
called. The director, Peter, colludes with the financier Ferrari (not
the car) to retool the show to be about Wallace instead of a generic
killer in an owl mask. In order to get the changes made, Peter
arranges for most of the cast to be locked in the theater to rehearse
the new script, and they are all trapped inside with the killer.
Bloody mayhem ensues.
What we
have here is a very intelligent horror movie. Everything that happens
is setup right, nothing is left to chance. Plot devices that become
important later are properly shown earlier. The actors do a credible
job, even with the above mentioned dubbing. The music is aggressively
80's synth, which in my opinion works nicely, but hasn't aged
terribly well.
For being
an “80's slasher” Stagefright avoids most cliches or at least
subverts them. There is no nudity just for the sake of it. One short
flash in a scene where a dancer changes her costume is it, and it
makes sense within the narrative. The killer kills because he wants
to and that's it. No pointless moralizing. Soavi even plays with
slasher tropes a bit just for fun but not so that it gets in the way.
In the way
of nitpicks, a couple of the corpses are breathing if you look
carefully, and I have no idea where he gets the pickaxe for the first
murder from, but the biggest flaw is when,
SPOILER
WARNING
a dancer
is pulled through the floor. Her boyfriend and the director are both
pulling on her arms for all they're worth while the killer somehow
holds her down and manages to cut her in half. A chainsaw sound
effect was accidentally left out, but still it's an impossible feat.
Wallace is big but the two guys should have pulled him up with the
girl.
SPOILER
ENDS
Bottom
line, Stagefright is a really good slasher style horror movie. If
these films are your cup of tea, and you haven't seen it, you need
to. It's as simple as that!
That's
that. Join me again next time and until then, have a great week!
No comments:
Post a Comment