I first saw House of
Cards in the early 90's on the BBC, and I fell in love. I had never
seen anything like it. The treachery, the plotting, the cold-blooded
destruction of lives, careers and reputations. Incredibly powerful
stuff.
Ian Richardson as
Francis Urquhart, the Tory Chief Whip has been cemented in my mind as
the ultimate cunning statesman; as smooth and charming as he is
vicious and cruel.
But this isn't about
that. Well not exactly. This is about the 2013 remake starring Kevin
Spacey as Francis Underwood, the Democratic Congressional Majority
Whip. Mr. Spacey is an excellent veteran actor, and delivers a good
performance as usual.
Both shows follow the
same path more or less, but with the BBC version lasting only four
hours, and the Netflix show spanning thirteen 45 minute episodes, the
americans have been forced to find more things to do. This naturally
changes the story quite a bit, but it's not necessarily a bad thing.
At first, I was
unconvinced as I started watching, but I soon realized that to simply
copy the original would have been wrong. This remake is more of a
proper rewrite, in that it is an american show about american
politics. Their political system is bigger and perhaps more
complicated (I'm no expert), and the new show reflects that I think.
Soon enough I happily settled in to enjoy what they had to offer.
That's when a creeping
sense of unease set in. Several changes have been made, and while
mostly understandable, several major changes felt out of place.
Take Francis as an
example. Superficially the changes from Urquhart to Underwood are
unimportant, but where Urquhart wielded a scalpel, Underwood uses an
axe, and there is no way Urquhart would ever have made the mistakes
Underwood did. Like go on CNN and make an absolute ass of himself.
This takes away a great deal of the characters panache. At times it
feels as if he hadn't really thought out his scheme at all.
Underwood does use the
famous line ”You might think that, but I couldn't possibly
comment”. This line was made famous by the original House of Cards,
and has been used by real politicians since.
Then there's Francis's
right hand man. Originally Tim Stamper, now Doug Stamper. The name
change is of no matter, but the personality change is definately a
problem. A whips job is to reign in and guide the more junior members
of the party, MP and Congressman alike. Now Tim could get the job
done, with terror if need be, but Doug comes across as whiny rather
than scary. Not good...
But the worst major
personality change comes in the shape of the young female journalist.
Mattie Storin becomes Zoe Barnes. Again no issue with the name, but
the character, as an inexperienced reporter with a keen nose for a
good story and great instincts, who becomes involved with the great
statesman, Mattie filled the role admirably where Zoe is rude,
arrogant and as sublte as a brick to the face. The whole character
fails completely. Instead of sympathy I felt contempt.
There's a long plotline
with Mrs. Underwood and her work, that never existed in the original,
but this works pretty well, as they really needed something to do
with their time increase. I didn't find it that interesting, but it
wasn't bad.
They have also done a
good job depicting the relationship between corporate and political
America, I have no complaints about that.
Overall, the Netflix
version is pretty enjoyable, but it feels quite clumsy compared to
the original. It misses the mark more than once, but not so often as
to ruin the show.
No comments:
Post a Comment