Hello all, and welcome to the last Eccentric Sphere of 2016.
With all the hullaballoo of the holidays I'm pretty tired, so it's going to be a short post today.
I want to thank everyone who continues to read my blog, you are what keeps me going week after week.
This is post 228, and I have no plans on stopping. I hope you will all continue to read my eccentric spheres in the coming year. Here's hoping 2017 will be a great year for everyone!
Until we meet again I'll leave you some entertainment and wish you a Happy New Year! Cheers!
The Marianas Trench
The making of The Godfather
The complete Speakeasy interviews
Monday, December 26, 2016
Monday, December 19, 2016
Jingle Bells
The year is coming to an end and the Holidays are upon us. In my case I have a lot of things to do, so I have to pull a fast one today.
But this can be a stressful time of year, so I figured you could use a suitable distraction. Here are two Youtube channels that can perhaps relax and lighten your load.
Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh_IZEFAXi4caDRwPdL_wxQ/videos
Stand-Up:
https://www.youtube.com/user/justforlaughscomedy/videos
There are of course tons of others, but this is a small start. Have yourself a root around if you feel the need.
I have to run, so until next week, let me wish you a happy holiday!
But this can be a stressful time of year, so I figured you could use a suitable distraction. Here are two Youtube channels that can perhaps relax and lighten your load.
Documentaries:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh_IZEFAXi4caDRwPdL_wxQ/videos
Stand-Up:
https://www.youtube.com/user/justforlaughscomedy/videos
There are of course tons of others, but this is a small start. Have yourself a root around if you feel the need.
I have to run, so until next week, let me wish you a happy holiday!
Monday, December 12, 2016
Can a window laugh?
Hello, and
welcome back to Eccentric Spheres!
This weeks
topic is La casa dalle finestre che ridono, or The House with
Laughing Windows (1976) for those of you, like me, who don't speak
Italian. A good friend of mine recommended this film a long time ago,
but it wasn't until last week that I sat down to watch it.
What we
have here is an Italian horror movie quite unlike any other I've
seen, and I've seen a lot of them. And I do mean a lot. Names like
Dario Argento, Lucio Fulci, Mario Bava and his son Lamberto Bava,
Michele Soavi and many others have created an enormous catalog of
horror that I've spent a large part of my life enjoying, but The
House with Laughing Windows is not by any of these power houses of
Italian horror.
No, The
House with Laughing Windows is by a man I had never heard of: Pupi
Avati. I can honestly say I haven't seen any of his other films as
far as I know. But on with the laughing windows.
Here we
meet Stefano, a painter who arrives at an isolated town in order to
restore a mural of St. Sebastian in the local church. He has been
hired by the mayor, since the mayor thinks the mural will help boost
the dwindling tourism numbers. He meets an old friend who is working
in the town, who tries to warn him about a terrible danger. He also
meets a pretty young girl, Francesca, who arrives at the same time to
work as a teacher. Then things go wrong and nasty stuff happens. You
know, horror things, this isn't a romantic comedy after all. I'm not
going to spoil the plot, so I can't go deeper into it.
The House
with Laughing Windows is in many ways an unusual horror movie. While
it does use many conventional horror tropes, like the town drunk who
spills the beans to the main character, it seems to do so with a good
understanding of why they work. I didn't really find a single trope
out of place here. Many directors lazily toss them in with no care
for the overall effect, much to the detriment of their movies. Not so
with Pupi Avati and The House with Laughing Windows. The overall
atmosphere is excellent, not too heavy but constantly unsettling.
There is something about this film that is hard to put your finger
on. There's not that much blood and no real nudity nor are there any
monsters, so the majority of he run time is filled with talking, but
it never gets dull. The pacing is very good and it never hits you
over the head with explanations. Most of the mystery is sort of
explained, but not all. If you hate that sort of thing, be warned,
you really have to pay attention the whole time.
I watched
a subtitled version, and to be honest the subtitles were atrocious. I
get that it's not easy but it was bad. Like when the mayor has picked
up Stefano and his driver suddenly swerves, the mayor yells “Hey,
are you asleep at the wheel?” and the driver, Coppola, turns around
and very earnestly says, “No, not at all.” Hilarious. But bad
subtitling is par for course with horror movies. I still remember
trying to watch an Italian horror film (I forget which one) dubbed to
french with dutch subtitling. Suffice to say that was impossible.
To sum up,
I recommend The House with Laughing Windows if you want a different
Italian horror movie. There are no zombies, cannibals, demons or
murderers with black leather gloves to be found, but it is all things
considered, excellent for what it is.
That's it
for me this time. Until we meet again, have a great week!
Monday, December 5, 2016
Karnstein Trilogy
Every once
in a while, the specter of Hammer Films returns from the shadows to
haunt me.
This time
it possessed me to re-watch the Karnstein trilogy. It's been many
years since I saw any of them, and to my surprise I found two of them
on Youtube of all places.
Anyway,
the Karnstein trilogy is loosely based on Sheridan Le Fanu's novel
Carmilla (1871-72), which predates Bram Stokers classic Dracula by
twenty-six years, making it one of the earliest western vampire
stories. At the time it was somewhat scandalous due to its lesbian
content, something the films echo to varying degrees.
The Hammer
Films trilogy consists of The Vampire Lovers (1970), Lust for aVampire (1971) and Twins of Evil (1971). An interesting point is that
the third movie is essentially a prequel, since the clothes are
distinctly 18th century, but in Lust for a Vampire they
state that the year is 1830. A part from this fact, the chronology is
all over the place. Carmillas birth and death dates vary from movie
to movie. Not that it matters in the slightest. These movies don't
take themselves too seriously, and neither should you.
Overall,
the two first films have very similar plot. Mircalla (Carmilla)
Karnstein returns from the grave and insinuates herself into the lives of
innocent girls in order to feast on their blood. In the third movie,
Twins of Evil, she makes only a brief appearance in order to make the
current Count Karnstein a vampire.
The
Vampire Lovers is really good. Ingrid Pitt as Carmilla is excellent,
as she manages to be both vulnerable and predatory at the same time.
Essentially she is a very tragic and rather sympathetic figure since
she can't help but fall in love with her victims, yet she can't stop
herself from devouring them either. The rest of the cast works well,
and the movie although slow paced, never gets dull. This is the best
in the trilogy by far.
The second
movie, Lust for a Vampire, is the weakest. It's still enjoyable and
to be fair it's not badly made at all, but the script is weak and
most of the actors sleepwalk through the scenes. Ingrid Pitt refused
to reprise her role as Carmilla and the role went to Yutte Stensgaard
instead. I can't say whether it was the script or the direction, but
she made a rather dull Carmilla compared to Ingrid. This is also the
only entry in the series that don't feature the late great Peter
Cushing, as his wife was sick during filming. I'd say watch it the
once.
Twins of
Evil is perhaps the most famous, as it stars twin Playboy Playmates,
Mary and Madeleine Collinson. The title is a bit misleading, since
only one of the girls is evil. Cushing appears again, but in another
role from Lovers. Twins is again well made, but unlike the others it
is funny. I have no idea if this was an intentional choice by the
film makers, but it is at times pretty hilarious. Absolutely worth
watching.
A couple
of interesting points should be made about the Karnstein vampires.
They can walk around during the day all they like, although they
prefer to stay in the shadow. Sunlight does nothing to them
whatsoever. They are hurt by crosses, annoyed by garlic, and fire is
useless. To kill them, you have to stake their hearts and/or behead
them. Also, they have to return to their graves but unlike Dracula,
it seems they can't take their coffins with them.
A side
note on staking: As in all Hammer (and many other) movies, the heart
seems to be located somewhere in the abdomen, since that's where the
stakes inevitably and up.
I could go
on with a more in depth analysis of each movie, but it's better if
you watch them yourself. I like them, and if you fancy Gothic Horror,
you might too.
Until next
time, have a vampire-free week!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)